In recent years, the landscape of the appliance industry in China has undergone significant transformation, especially with the strategic maneuvering of major players into the realm of robotics. A pivotal moment was marked by Midea's acquisition of the German robotics firm KUKA, which not only signified a bold leap into advanced technology but also ignited a fierce competition among domestic appliance manufacturers to explore the burgeoning robotics sector.
Since that landmark acquisition, numerous corporations have ventured into robotics, including large enterprises like Midea, Haier, Xiaomi, Gree, and Changhong, alongside smaller firms such as Dechang and Aishida. The interest in robotics by these appliance companies stems from a growing realization that the domestic market is nearing saturation, necessitating fresh avenues for growth. Robotics presents itself as a compelling option with the potential for innovation and expansion.
However, the path to transforming from traditional appliances to robotics is fraught with challenges, particularly for smaller players who struggle to compete with the deep pockets and capabilities of larger firms. The recent turmoil in the stock market gives a concerning glimpse into the volatility faced by these companies as investors speculate on their futures.
Since announcing their involvements in robotics, significant announcements have increased interest in the sector. On November 6, CATL, a lithium battery titan, completed an angel investment round with a humanoid robotics startup, Qianxun Zhihui, indicating a diversification attempt into humanoid robotics. Just a week later, Huawei publicly launched its global Entrepreneurship Center for Embodied Intelligence, forging strategic partnerships with sixteen AI enterprises.
Advertisement
That same month, Chang'an Automobile declared that over the next five years, it would invest more than 50 billion yuan into vertical transport solutions and humanoid robotics, setting a project deadline for flying cars by 2026. Meanwhile, ByteDance's subsidiary Doubao is negotiating with humanoid robotics startup MagicLab regarding a third-generation humanoid robot, further underscoring the explosive interest in humanoid robotics.
The influx of major players into the humanoid robotics sphere has notably influenced the A-share market, revitalizing investor enthusiasm for robotics stocks. Following Chang'an's announcement, A-share robotics-related stocks soared in popularity. Notably, Aishida, a listed home appliance company that has been involved in robotics since 2016, witnessed its stock price surge significantly. From November 19 to November 25, Aishida's stock experienced an astonishing daily uptick, culminating in a remarkable increase that continued over several days—culminating in a 60% overall gain since the last quarter.
Unfortunately, these gains were not to last; Aishida's sudden reversal began as a broader market pullback emerged, leading to consecutive declines that echoed across multiple sectors. The company's stock, which had dramatically increased earlier, hit a ceiling as it faced a two-day limit down, further exacerbated by concerns over high pledging rates among shareholders.
Encompassing part of the broader systemic issues, Aishida stands out with a worrisome pattern of high share pledges from its major stakeholders, notably Chen Helin and Chen Lingqiao, both of whom have pledged over 60% of their holdings. This high level of share pledge is often indicative of financial strains and a desperate need for liquidity. As detailed in their announcements, the primary focus for these pledges is for operational expenses—alerting investors to the precariousness of Aishida's financial health and raising red flags about the company's long-term viability.
Aishida's narrative further exemplifies the struggle of many companies in the appliance sector, where performance woes have been notable, particularly amid losses incurred from their pivot towards robotics. Initially heralded as a domestic leader in kitchenware manufacturing and sales in 2010, Aishida boasted expansions in revenue and market share. However, as competition accelerated with giants like Supor, their growth trajectory skewed. By 2023, Aishida reported alarming figures: 24.57 billion yuan in revenue versus a net loss of over 3.78 billion yuan, starkly juxtaposed against Supor's impressive growth fueled by strategic advancements.
The plight began to crystallize in 2016, when Aishida initiated acquisitions in robotics, beginning with a substantial stake in Qianjiang Robot at an exorbitant premium. The valuation mismatch became evident as their operational assets diminished relative to the burden of acquisitions, and as a result, the company began accumulating goodwill—an intangible asset that can heavily impact financial statements, especially when it necessitates impairment charges. The core issue manifests in Aishida's confusion over its identity and strategic direction, leading to sustained downward pressures on their profitability.
As Aishida continued to expand through aggressive acquisitions, it failed to yield the anticipated results, prompting declines in operating income—a central pillar for sustainability. The costs associated with these acquisitions resulted in a staggering impairment loss in subsequent years, with total goodwill falling sharply from over 100 million to approximately 33 million yuan by 2023. The results have been disheartening, showcasing a company that not only struggles with operational income but also falls prey to an asset turnover crisis that has stymied recovery.
This corporate trajectory illuminates broader issues in China’s appliance market, where the urgency to evolve into robotics clashes with the realities of execution. Corporate strategies reliant on acquisitions without coherent integration often lead to pitfalls, futures derailed by external market pressures or internal mismanagement.
Investors and stakeholders will undoubtedly observe the comparability of companies like Aishida versus peers such as Supor—who opted for restraint and organic growth strategies, maintaining equity without pledges on their holdings. The success narrative shared by Supor starkly contrasts with Aishida, where continuous pledging and financial distress reflect a company at the crux of its identity crisis.
The tale of Aishida serves as a cautionary note for manufacturers—illustrating how ambition can quickly turn into overreach, a miscalculation that can devastate shares, erode goodwill, and tarnish a brand's legacy in the hotly contested appliance marketplace. Unquestionably, it is an illustration of how "attitude dictates outcomes," and in so doing, illuminates the necessary precision required to balance aspiration with capability in one’s growth initiatives.